Skip to content

Sam Adams, Firebrand of the Revolution: Journalist or Blogger?

May 10, 2011

Journalists are supposed to report the News.  They’re supposed to be governed by a Code of Ethics that demands  they report News without offering personal bias, deliberately distorting facts, or taking incidents out of context.  The Code of Ethics suggests multiple times that Journalists avoid conflicts of interest.  Bloggers, on the other hand, want to convince people of their points of view and, in doing that, they let it all hang out.  There is no tactic of communication  too high or too low to be undertaken by a blogger on a mission.

Samuel Adams, Firebrand of Revolution

Samuel Adams, Firebrand of Revolution

     Sam Adams, American Revolutionary activist, was a blogger and not a journalist.  He began his written activism by writing hundreds of articles for the Boston Gazette and quickly moved from news writing to opinion writing.  His work was done for one purpose:  he portrayed the British soldiers in Boston as uncouth, vile, criminal louts and kept up a running cry that they be removed from American soil.  Adams started a kind of early Associated Press, called “Journal of Occurrences” and each day for 300 days, published the crimes of British soldiers.  He made sure Colonials knew of the course and abusive language the soldiers used, of the petty thefts they committed, and the rapes and assaults that were perpetrated upon the fine ladies of the land.  Adams reported all of these with a sense of well-written  moral outrage, and his spicy accounts were much more interesting than the local weather forecasts that routinely filled other newspapers.   The British troops were eventually removed from Boston, and Adams ceased publication of the “Journal of Occurrences.”  The Revolutionaries, of course, moved right on into throwing tea into Boston Harbour and throwing the British out of the Colonies.  God bless America and so forth.

The Journal accomplished its mission and fanned flames of hatred against the British but did have one minor flaw:  a great deal of what Adams reported as fact was not true.  Many of the occurrences that were reported weren’t even accidentally misrepresented, but instead were deliberate lies.  Based on these facts, it’s clear that Adams was not a good Journalist but he was a damned fine opinion writer, activist, and all-around trouble maker for anybody in a red coat.

Samuel Adams Lager, Firebrand of Hangovers

Samuel Adams Lager, Firebrand of Hangovers

 

 
 
Photo of Sam Adams from earlyamerica.com  and photo of Samuel Adams Lager from boston.com
Advertisements
No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: